write a go solution for Description: It turns out that this is exactly the 100-th problem of mine that appears in some programming competition. So it has to be special! And what can be more special than another problem about LIS... You are given a permutation p_1,p_2,ldots,p_2n+1 of integers from 1 to 2n+1. You will have to process q updates, where the i-th update consists in swapping p_u_i,p_v_i. After each update, find any cyclic shift of p with LIS<=n, or determine that there is no such shift. (Refer to the output section for details). Here LIS(a) denotes the length of longest strictly increasing subsequence of a. Hacks are disabled in this problem. Don't ask why. Input Format: The first line of the input contains two integers n,q (2<=n<=10^5, 1<=q<=10^5). The second line of the input contains 2n+1 integers p_1,p_2,ldots,p_2n+1 (1<=p_i<=2n+1, all p_i are distinct) — the elements of p. The i-th of the next q lines contains two integers u_i,v_i (1<=u_i,v_i<=2n+1, u_ineqv_i) — indicating that you have to swap elements p_u_i,p_v_i in the i-th update. Output Format: After each update, output any k (0<=k<=2n), such that the length of the longest increasing subsequence of (p_k+1,p_k+2,ldots,p_2n+1,p_1,ldots,p_k) doesn't exceed n, or -1, if there is no such k. Note: After the first update, our permutation becomes (5,2,3,4,1). We can show that all its cyclic shifts have LIS>=3. After the second update, our permutation becomes (1,2,3,4,5). We can show that all its cyclic shifts have LIS>=3. After the third update, our permutation becomes (1,2,3,5,4). Its shift by 2 is (3,5,4,1,2), and its LIS=2. After the fourth update, our permutation becomes (1,2,3,4,5). We can show that all its cyclic shifts have LIS>=3. After the fifth update, our permutation becomes (4,2,3,1,5). Its shift by 4 is (5,4,2,3,1), and its LIS=2. After the fifth update, our permutation becomes (4,5,3,1,2). Its shift by 0 is (4,5,3,1,2), and its LIS=2.. Output only the code with no comments, explanation, or additional text.