Description: Alex thinks some array is good if there exists some element that can be represented as the sum of all other elements (the sum of all other elements is $$$0$$$ if there are no other elements). For example, the array $$$[1,6,3,2]$$$ is good since $$$1+3+2=6$$$. Furthermore, the array $$$[0]$$$ is also good. However, the arrays $$$[1,2,3,4]$$$ and $$$[1]$$$ are not good. Alex has an array $$$a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n$$$. Help him count the number of good non-empty prefixes of the array $$$a$$$. In other words, count the number of integers $$$i$$$ ($$$1 \le i \le n$$$) such that the length $$$i$$$ prefix (i.e. $$$a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_i$$$) is good. Input Format: The first line of the input contains a single integer $$$t$$$ ($$$1 \leq t \leq 10^4$$$) — the number of test cases. The first line of each test case contains a single integer $$$n$$$ ($$$1 \le n \le 2 \cdot 10^5$$$) — the number of elements in the array. The second line of each test case contains $$$n$$$ integers $$$a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n$$$ ($$$0 \le a_i \le 10^9$$$) — the elements of the array. It is guaranteed that the sum of $$$n$$$ over all test cases does not exceed $$$2 \cdot 10^5$$$. Output Format: For each test case, output a single integer — the number of good non-empty prefixes of the array $$$a$$$. Note: In the fourth test case, the array has five prefixes: - prefix $$$[0]$$$ is a good array, as mentioned in the statement; - prefix $$$[0, 1]$$$ is not a good array, since $$$0 \ne 1$$$; - prefix $$$[0, 1, 2]$$$ is not a good array, since $$$0 \ne 1 + 2$$$, $$$1 \ne 0 + 2$$$ and $$$2 \ne 0 + 1$$$; - prefix $$$[0, 1, 2, 1]$$$ is a good array, since $$$2 = 0 + 1 + 1$$$; - prefix $$$[0, 1, 2, 1, 4]$$$ is a good array, since $$$4 = 0 + 1 + 2 + 1$$$. As you can see, three of them are good, so the answer is $$$3$$$.